The Russians were hungry, war
weary, and dispossessed, and in 1917, they rallied behind the slogan "Bread,
peace, and land.” Their revolution was followed by famine, civil war, and
collectivization. Nevertheless, "bread" on a banner still scares authorities —
when the masses are actually hungry.
Should today’s plutocrats be
alarmed by Elizabeth Renzetti’s introduction of the phrase “have-not
generation” in her shout-out column about comic Russell Brand’s viral call
for another revolution?
Here’s how Elizabeth
Renzetti defines
our bracing times:
“Mr.
Brand’s rant struck a big, brassy chord; he’s given shape to an inchoate sense
of anger and frustration, especially among the have-not generation. The clip of
his appearance was forwarded to me by a talented, ambitious and politically
disengaged 21-year-old with the words ‘All of my beliefs were verbalized by an
unlikely fellow yesterday. All of my friends/colleagues and I agree
wholehearted with it.’”
Are radicals and their
colleagues finally going to take the lead — or does it still matter which
best-selling class analyst wins Toronto’s by-election next week? As a
phrase-maker, is Renzetti making history? Does the phrase even ring true?
She may have captured a young
man’s "beliefs." But does the phrase "have-not generation" capture his
circumstances? This is an important question: revolutionary slogans are
telling, not argumentative. They mustn’t leave you bemused or scratching your head.
Does "deprivation" properly define today’s generation of ambitious young
adults living in the West’s great cosmopolitan centers of inequity and greed?
Are their politics and private choices being radicalized by an awful awareness that
they are going without all the things we had when we were young?
Before listing a few things
they don’t have, here’s the big thing they share with young adults in the sunny
days well before globalization and Ronald Reagan: double-digit unemployment,
even among middle-class whites. Today, the pain is aggravated by uncertainty
about long-term job prospects. The big problem isn’t that central
governments are less sophisticated in responding to recessions or that those
legendary great jobs in manufacturing are rarer than ever, but that the white-collar job market is increasingly global — and fairer.
A revolution against xenophobia
and sexist and racist education, employment, and promotion practices has put
young men on a level playing field. Yet
for revolutionaries, this is about managing a liberal accomplishment, not
launching one.
While waiting for your next
contract or standing in line with students at Starbucks, think about the frustrations
and fears that once inspired revolutionary one-liners and aren’t useful anymore:
* Compulsory military service
* Old-fashioned ground wars
in Asia
* Mutually assured destruction
* Co-existence or nuclear
winter
* Armed division of Europe
* Acid rain and an
approaching ice age
* Double-digit inflation
* Double-digit mortgages
* Population bomb
* Peak oil
* Y2K
* Police without civilian
oversight
* Governments without ombudsmen
* Parents who immediately took
the teacher’s side
* Parents with small houses
and no pensions
* Parents that wouldn’t finance
even your first degree
* Parents who never said, "I’m
sorry"
* Fathers who said, "Do better
than I did"
* Margaret Thatcher’s
lectures
* Bill Clinton’s innocence
* Papal infallibility
Renzetti notes that only 19%
of Americans trust the federal government today. Is America ripe for
revolutionary change? In the '60s, parents were far more trusting, and
students called presidents “Baby Killers” and police officers “Pigs”.
Certainly, it’s safer to talk revolution today. However, youth’s list of common
grievances isn’t especially intimidating.
Of course, rather than trying
to find a fresh hot button for an entire generation, proselytizers today could
pick up some of the unfinished minor themes of the past — poverty, mental
illness, and nuclear proliferation could could use greater attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment