It can’t be said—yet—that
the world media thinks Canada is fascinating and its policy-makers especially
brilliant or dangerous. You won’t see film
crews from CNN and BBC hanging out in Ottawa’s Press Club, or in the villages
and cities where Ottawa priorities are causing noticeable harm. However, a
storm of sorts must be building: policy wonks on most every floor of the United
Nation’s New York headquarters seem very excited about Canada.
Over the last year, formal UN
reports and senior UN spokespeople have attacked Canada’s performance in SEVEN
areas of policy interest: breaking up a public wheat marketing monopoly,
exposing dairy and egg marketing boards
in trade talks with the EU, neglecting
Canada’s Charter obligations overseas, marginalizing Aboriginals, making the supplementary long form census voluntary,
letting Canada fall to 11th in human development, and, finally, not having a national strategy to make
urban bicycling safer.
(The UN left it to Amnesty International to question the Quebec Legislature’s response to
spontaneous student parades in Montreal.)
Behind the happy surface
facts about never failing to pay its UN dues and being second only to the US as
the most popular destination in the world for high skilled immigrants. Behind
its recent sacrifices in Afghanistan and Haiti, is Canada stealthily turning
against those magnificent UN Charter aspirations that Canada helped write in
the late 1940s?
Does Canada need a special
audit and high-profile outside reminder about how to be a topnotch Western
democracy?
Awkward questions.
If you answer, “Get lost,” eventually
you might start thinking complacently: seeing Canada as another complete,
historical jewel separated from Scandinavia.
If you start seriously worrying
about the country’s "image," former Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien will
think you miss him, along with all the other polite people he meets at
funerals and chases down in boardrooms around the world.
There are no damning moral or
aspirational gaps or data black holes in Canadian governance. Neither Ottawa nor the City of Toronto needs emergency services from the UN. And Canadian
UN-sponsored consultants and aid workers needn’t rush back from Eastern Europe,
Africa, or the Middle East to fix Canada’s democracy, mixed economy, or public
health services.
Still, is something dangerous
going on at the UN?
We’d need more evidence to
fear that the UN thinks it’s important to get Canadians to “rise up” and throw
out Stephen Harper. Nevertheless, the newsy, gratuitous nature of much of their
concern about what’s going on in Canada clearly points to a classic
bureaucratic malaise.
The UN is steadily becoming
less effective in addressing global problems—even being at the same table with
leading problem-solvers. Furthermore, its continuing budget pressures must keep
its vast policy machinery nervous.
Making news about even-tempered
places like Canada on how they can do better is one way for their policy
professionals to look busy and keep their jobs.
Religious organizatiοns ωill haѵе а higher tendenсу tо seaгch
ReplyDeleteοut prοducts and іnformation. Peoρlе hе busіnеѕѕ ρointѕ
οut aгe no different. The potential headaches arе plentiful, but thе stοre you purchаsed from is still sending you emails about othег
products, ѕales, marketing, Intеrnet advеrtіsing is also becoming popular in India.
It business сan't get any more intimate than that! Thus, when you bill a customer, he looked at everything Patagonia made, shipped or processed, and resolved to do it.
my web site - cleveland internet marketing