Yesterday, in Houston, Texas,
Canada’s Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver promised that Canada will soon announce tough climate
change regulations for its oil and gas sector. Following Ambassador Jacobson’s
script, Oliver asserted:
“'Canada
is the largest supplier of heavy oil to the U.S., and soon to be one of the few
with stringent oil and gas GHG [greenhouse gas] regulations,' Mr. Oliver told a
friendly crowd at the CERAWeek energy conference. 'In contrast, other suppliers
are doing little or nothing to manage GHG emissions.'
“As
a result, Canada represents 'the most and perhaps only responsible choice' for
the United States to meet its oil import needs, he said.”
Will this ease Barack Obama’s
decision-making on the Keystone XL pipeline? Is it even relevant? Not likely.
Here, in the same story, is the response of a key anti-Keystone lobby:
“'We
need a credible system that actually reduces absolute emissions,' Gillian
McEachern, campaign director for Environmental Defence, said in an interview
from Toronto.
“Ms.
McEachern said Canada lags oil producers such as Norway, the United Kingdom and
Australia in imposing climate regulations.”
These terms for agreeing to
the pipeline, unsurprisingly, are impossible.
It’s quite feasible that
Canada (and, hey, the United States, too) could significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions in
absolute terms, nationally or in a continental deal. However, to expect Canada to cut emissions
absolutely in its strongest export sector is, for the foreseeable future, an
intolerable idea. Why not simply insist on a Western Canadian recession?
Furthermore, why should
Norway’s off-shore environmental standards—whatever their supposed technical relevance—get
into a decision about the responsible extraction of heavy oil in landlocked
Alberta? What do they have to do with maintaining free trade in North America?
Why isn’t it good enough for Canadian standards to be as good as—and improve
in tandem with—environment standards within the US energy market?
It’s a safe bet that the climate change movement will never be cornered into going along with the Keystone XL
pipeline.
Why let this decision fester
on your desk, Mr. President?
By Canadian standards of good
manners: Wouldn’t it be nice if—before you go to Israel to puff up a
difficult conservative Prime Minister—you cleared up this pipeline
question with a conservative Prime Minister in Canada, one who has caused you not a
single serious worry in four years?
No comments:
Post a Comment