It used to be easy for Republican politicians to warn that
runaway government spending would destroy the American Dream and global
progress too. Then, along came the awkward elections of 2010 and 2012, when the
whole country started to take them seriously. Churchillian rhetoric found
itself at war.
During his first debate with that appeaser in the White
House, Romney announced with fatherly finality that he’d fire “Big Bird.” An illusion of children and a yellow body costume
would have to be sacrificed.
In not asking anything from voters with any propensity to
vote Republican, he trivialized his campaign and made fiscal probity a laughing
matter.
Stopping the Keystone
Project that proposes to transport crude oil from Alberta’s oil
sands to under-utilized Texas refiners is the environment movement’s “Big
Bird.” Opposing the project generates great visuals, but it offers no strategic value
in the fight to stabilize greenhouse gas emissions.
On behalf of the young science of climate change, the
project’s opponents ignore nearly three centuries of science on how economies
work. They insist the globe’s health is at risk and then aim their guns at
Canadian enterprise that won’t alter global prices or fossil fuel consumption, neither
globally nor in the US. They single out
a high-cost producer of fossil fuels rather than the cheaper sources of oil
that actually allow for excessive consumption.
They say politicians have to start acting globally, in
concert, while lobbying the President to divide the continent’s energy market
and, in effect, abrogate trade agreements with Canada. They say corporations
are polluters and that the middle class is innocent, while complaining that their
adversaries are ideological.
They tell Washington politicians to take extreme action
against Canadian interests and Albertans who can’t vote and look the other way
as US swing states undertake a “renaissance” in fossil development.
There is nothing wrong with playing politics to save the world
or, for instance, just a piece of Western civilization. Al Gore and the chief
strategists of the climate-change movement, however, appear no smarter or more sincere
than Mitt Romney.
Ultimately, we’ve
got to do something about entitlements, hard-faced Republicans insist. But
first let’s cut off PBS. Ultimately,
we have to put a significant price on carbon, Al Gore concedes in the Guardian. And first let’s threaten to burn Barack Obama in effigy if—after all the
proper environmental reviews are complete—he doesn’t kill the Keystone pipeline
project.
Cynicism doesn’t make climate change or public debt smaller
problems. It can, however, crowd out
constructive discussion and serious problem-solving.
No comments:
Post a Comment