Once in a while, without a hand from outside "fact-checkers"
or partisan "attack machines," the best journalists in the mainstream media
light up the sky and show us what is at stake.
With one column, and its ghastly aftermath, Maureen Dowd
reintroduces us to the people Mitt Romney would bring back to the White
House—the warrior intellectuals of the Bush years. Her New York Times column Neocons Slither Back,
and the next morning’s Politico
summary of their outraged responses, should be read together.
Alone, Dowd’s column is merely a workmanlike reminder that
Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan rely on the same neocons George Bush used to intellectualize
about shaping events around the world with US armed forces. It contained two
rather unoriginal insults: suggesting that Paul Ryan relies on the words of his
campaign manager, Dan Senor, a right-wing flack with a world view, and repeating
Paul Wolfowitz’s concern that Obama should not be allowed to “slither” back
into office without a clear position on Libya.
By next morning, five neocons were already on record accusing
the outrageous Maureen Dowd of being a creepy, hate-mongering, and lazy peddler
of anti-Semitic imagery. Apparently "slither" has Jewish copyright. It can be
used by Jewish American hawks when questioning the "moral clarity" of a Kenyan-friendly
president, but can’t even be repeated by an insolent Catholic feminist in the New York Times.
The accusation that Dowd was reviving a vile ancient
stereotype about doltish gentile politicians being manipulated by “clever and
snake-like Jews” is laughably self- aggrandizing, ineffectual, and uncivil. It
tells us, however, that the neocons have lost none of their edge, that their
menace is as fresh as a fall north wind.
Maureen Dowd is too smart to think and too good a writer to
imply that Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and George Bush were stupid, innocent
puppets of the neocons. She was simply reminding us that the staff a president assembles
reflects on the character of the president, and doesn’t diminish his power.
This incident, however, does say quite a lot about the
caliber of the public intellectuals Romney and Ryan are presently indulging.
They misjudged the Middle East over the last decade and misjudge their
detractors at home today.
Accusing someone of being anti-Semitic is going nuclear.
It’s the polemist’s application of “shock and awe.” It’s designed to cower
weaklings. Dowd, however, is still at it.
No comments:
Post a Comment