Put Samuel Johnson’s observation in the past tense,
my friend Tim Knight suggested: patriotism was
the last refuge of scoundrels—now, nationalism, it’s vulgar cousin, usually
comes first.
In the US, Republican governors claim that state-based healthcare
programs are innovative and that federal healthcare programs are bureaucratic socialism.
In Canada, separatists claim that Quebec can be more efficient and expressive by
simply by not playing politics within the Canadian federation.
In the United States and in Western Europe, the left remains
very squeamish about nationalist claims: historically those claims have separated
workers, sheltered privilege, distracted the weak and lead to violence.
In Canada, the left is rather ambivalent: it now embraces
Canadian nationalism and, consequently, concedes that there’s something
admirable about Quebec’s more intense nationalist spirit. For instance, it’s
considered plain good manners to accept that the leaders of the Parti Quebecois
are social democrats in good standing, as well as soveriegntists.
Why, however, should we accept that they would govern faithfully
in the interest of Quebec workers, even if their ultimate aim is a pipe dream?
We’re told that they’re pragmatists; they’ll prepare the
ground for Quebec independence by launching a series of popular campaigns to
capture individual powers from “Harper’s Canada”; Stephen Harper, naturally,
will resist and further weaken the case for a federal Canada. Clever allegedly,
but would it be in the interest of Quebec workers? Would Quebec workers buy it?
The PQ’s most significant opening proposal—pulling Quebec
out of the Canadian Unemployment Insurance Program—certainly is not.
For over half a century the UI fund—the multi-billion dollar
pool of contributions by all employed Canadians—has been a significant net
benefit to unemployed Quebec workers and a significant net benefit to employed
Quebecers as well.
Sure, along with their allies in Eastern Canada and
elsewhere, they’ve have to keep fighting to protect seasonal unemployment benefits
that especially benefit high unemployment regions across Canada. Consequently,
on their own, with their own Quebec fund, they would be entirely free to
increase or simply not change the present cross-subsidization of seasonal
unemployed workers in Quebec.
However, no matter how close they then decide to respect or
stretched the insurance principles of unemployment insurance, Quebec workers
would be left to pay the whole shot without the help they presently receive
from the all-Canadian worker-funded UI program.
Defending the cross-Canada pooling of worker income
insurance, as a cross-Canada social benefit should be a no-brainer for real
social democrats as well as federalists in Quebec and elsewhere.
It’s a tribute to the amazing credibility of nationalism and
the confused state of the left in Canada that the PQ that would offer such a reckless
proposal as the front-runner in the present Quebec election.
Heh, if Harper is just a brute from Alberta, he might just accept the
idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment