The more China’s publicly owned enterprises fatten the bank
accounts of Communist Party insiders, the more sensitive authorities are to
informed dissent. Chinese state capitalism isn’t halfway to anywhere—it’s
arrived. What’s the point of carrying on about fixing what’s been fixed?
Ian Johnson in the New
York Times reports:
“Over the past decade, state
companies have maintained and expanded control over industries like
automobiles, aviation, chemicals, energy, information technology, machinery,
metals, steel and telecommunications.
“Mainstream criticism of this
trend, however, is limited. A propaganda department directive this year
explicitly banned the term 'monopoly' to describe state-owned enterprises.
Journalists say they regularly have articles kept from publication if they
discuss the deadening effect of state control over so many industries.
“This contrasts with the first
two decades of China’s economic opening, when the overall trend was toward
relaxing state control, and pro-market economists were household names.”
The impulse behind this crackdown is universal. Elites may go
in for recreational gambling, but have no interest in ideas that threaten their
security.
The form of China’s attack on the abstractions of Milton
Friedman and market economics is, nevertheless, laughably crude—it’s the work
of amateurs.
In the West, publicly owned corporations have almost
entirely outlived their original logic—accelerated provision of modern services
and infrastructure. However, after being around for decades, they protect
themselves effectively with more subtle techniques.
Rather than fight the word “monopoly,” they usually overwhelm
its negative connotations with other concerns. Our monopolies are called
“iconic” or “essential services” or “bulwarks” against outside cultural and
economic dominance. The alternatives are
portrayed as exploitative profiteers.
Time—in the West and, eventually, in China—is the greatest
factor that favors the perpetuation of monopolies.
The longer they’re around, the more the alternatives look
unreal and “ideologically driven.” Time, unfortunately, also corrodes their
value, whether privatized or not.
No comments:
Post a Comment