Seamanship Quotation

“In political activity, then, men sail a boundless and bottomless sea; there is neither harbour for shelter nor floor for anchorage, neither starting-place nor appointed destination.”
— from Michael Oakeshott's
Political Education” (1951)
Showing posts with label Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity. Show all posts

Friday, July 15, 2011

Canadians are superior at being happy

It was headline news in Canada that Canada did well in another international index. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development released the Better Life Index on eleven of its member nations. Canada, politely, came in second, just behind Australia but (whew) well ahead of seventh place US.


Canada especially impressed OECD researchers on the broad question of whether they were satisfied with their own lives. 78% are, compared to only 70% of Americans. Furthermore, their optimism is exceptional: 85% of Canadians say they expect their lives to be even more satisfying five years from now.

This nice little study should be saved for future reference by social historians but not taken too seriously as a guide to public policy or as an excuse for a steady-as-you-go approach to emerging demographic, geo-political and economic threats.

Another report just came out that offered less to brag about but more to debate. The Institute for Competitiveness & Prosperity highlighted the following in its release of “Canada’s innovation imperative.”

In its Report, the Institute reaffirms that Canada’s economy is one of the world’s most successful among countries with populations greater than 10 million. But against the United States, Canada’s GDP per capita continues to trail significantly. This gap represents lost prosperity potential, which negatively affects Canadians at all income levels.

“The Institute reports that Canada’s GDP per capita – a measure of the value created by workers and firms in Canada from the human, physical, and natural resources in the country – trailed the US by $9,500 or 17 percent in 2010, essentially unchanged from the 2009 gap of $9,200 in constant (2010) dollars. “What’s really troubling,” observed Roger Martin, Chairman of the Institute, “is that the prosperity gap has more than tripled since 1981 when it was only $2,700. That has to be a call to action for all Canadians.”


The 1988 Free Trade Agreement between our two countries hasn’t narrowed the gap in investment, income and output per worker between Canada and the US despite their similar growing labour forces. This productivity gap stands as conclusive evidence that our two economies haven’t integrated to our mutual benefit.

Harper and Obama’s efforts to fine-tune trade relations by smartening up a dumb border won’t disturb the Better Life index. But they won’t make either country  stronger competitors in a radically changing world.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Jim Milway suggests Canadian fiscal federalism can be improved

Jim Milway, Executive Director of Ontario’s Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity, responds to my blog of November 29th and offers worthwhile research:
“The problem we have with fiscal federalism is that it has taken resources out of Ontario and done little to improve the economic prospects of our have-not provinces. Our system is geared to transferring resources from have to have-nots. The US system - while transferring as much per capita across state lines as we do here in Canada - does not attempt to correct regional disparities. And yet there is much more fluidity in year-to-year state rankings of income per capita than in provincial rankings.
Our system may help equalize consumption of government services, but it doesn't help have-nots move up the ladder.”
See our work on this at:”
Their work deserves wide attention. The Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity has had the courage to open up Canada’s “iconic” fiscal equalization programs and say that we have missed the mark. As impressive, it has actually studied how American federalism works at the same problems.
Canada has relied on fixed, often indexed, top-down formulas for wealth sharing. The US has no one big national policy. Its rather evenly divided and competitive federal political system is constantly winning new allies and constantly responding in ad hoc ways to regional pressures.