Those who’ll
decide who wins Alberta’s election next week will be holding their noses for
change or holding their noses to keep the status quo. Political change, as well as corruption,
always smells. But you should try it now. Long ago, it was good for Alberta and,
if any place can afford it today, Alberta can.
Danielle
Smith isn’t the least bit concerned and she knows a thing or two about
political experimentation. Your credit is fantastic, your wealth-generating
capacity is enviable and resilient, you have built up a superior public service,
and your divisions are not bitter.
Admittedly,
Ontario isn’t a popular place from which to dare Albertans to take the plunge. We’ve
been a pain for decades about Alberta’s “advantage” and fiscal choices. Also,
as eastern cosmopolitans, our competence now is to advise on a fee-for-service
basis, in private. Nevertheless, Ontario has clearly led you on one thing: our relatively
recent experience at throwing out an ancient regime should steel your nerves
and challenge your pride.
Ontario
Progressive Conservatives won 12 elections and then were eased out in 1985.
Alberta Progressive Conservatives won their 12th election in 2012, and are
still in power. Stopping them now won’t be the end for the PCs, our Alberta’s
brand.
Alberta incumbents
are acting the way the Ontario ones did 30 years ago. Ridiculously
long-serving regimes don’t simply use scare tactics in elections—they are scared. They actually believe that
their lovely government can’t carry on successfully without them.
Call it patriotic
hysteria, if you wish.
Ontario has
experienced three changes in government over these last 30 years. Certainly
that’s plenty. The times have not been as easy for Ontario as they were in,
say, the '50s and '60s. It has been riding the business cycles of an open,
diversified, mid-continent jurisdiction. However, the provincial governments
since the days of the Big Blue Machine haven’t irrevocably altered Ontario’s
underlying characteristics, one way or another. We’ve discovered that our brand
remains appealing and is not the property of any one party.
Winning in the
midst of a resource recession, of course, isn’t ideal. However, Alberta
politics and government would be refreshed by either a Wildrose or a New
Democratic minority government.
Either would have
to pass a budget and avoid making big mistakes. So, they’ll have to listen intelligently
to professional public servants and voters who voted, hopefully, for positive change.
First, Wildrose
ministers wouldn’t owe the Alberta public service any thanks and that would be
scary—for public servants. However, each Wildrose minister would fight to keep
all program dollars and staff resources that they would discover were necessary
to provide popular public services.
Second, as a
national contender in this fall’s federal election, a win for the New Democrats
in Alberta could have greater political significance.
An indisputably
left-of-center government would finally have to manage and champion a great,
troubled resource economy.
Representing almost
exclusively consumer-oriented voters in political opposition for decades has
rusted thinking in the NDP and the credibility of the left across Canada. They
have found it too easy to be green. If they win power next week, they’ll have
to figure out how to be credible taxers of Alberta resources, competent environmental
regulators, and champions of oil and gas investment and transportation. If they’re
reluctant and fail at these tasks, they’ll be quickly thrown out.
The NDP wouldn’t
get to wreck Alberta, but they could make or break Thomas Mulcair this fall.
There are plenty
of incentives for a new Alberta government to behave and launch successful
reforms. This would be good for Alberta’s democracy: it would give the PCs a
nice pause to think outside of briefing sessions in government; and it would challenge
briefers in government service to do their very best for a strange new crowd
sent to them by the people.
No comments:
Post a Comment